International Financial Reporting Standards
Background
International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) are designed as a common
global language for business affairs so that company accounts are
understandable and comparable across international boundaries. They are a
consequence of growing international shareholding and trade and are
particularly important for companies that have dealings in several countries.
They are progressively replacing the many different national accounting
standards. The rules to be followed by accountants to maintain books of
accounts which are comparable, understandable, reliable and relevant as per the
users internal or external.
IFRS,
with the exception of IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyper-inflationary
Economies and IFRIC 7 Applying the Restatement Approach under
IAS 29, are authorized in terms of the historical cost paradigm. IAS 29 and
IFRIC 7 are authorized in terms of the units of constant purchasing power
paradigm.
IFRS
began as an attempt to harmonize accounting across the European Union but the
value of harmonization quickly made the concept attractive around the world. However,
it has been debated whether or not de facto harmonization has
occurred. Standards that were issued by IASC (the predecessor of IASB) and
are still within use today go by the name International Accounting
Standards (IAS), while standards issued by IASB are called IFRS. IAS
were issued between 1973 and 2001 by the Board of the International
Accounting Standards Committee (IASC). On 1 April 2001, the
new International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) took over from
the IASC the responsibility for setting International Accounting Standards.
During its first meeting the new Board adopted existing IAS and Standing
Interpretations Committee standards (SICs). The IASB has continued to develop
standards calling the new standards "International Financial Reporting
Standards".
In
the absence of a Standard or an Interpretation that specifically applies to a
transaction, management must use its judgement in developing and applying an
accounting policy that results in information that is relevant and reliable. In
making that judgement, IAS 8.11 requires management to consider the
definitions, recognition criteria, and measurement concepts for assets,
liabilities, income, and expenses in the Framework.
Criticisms of IFRS are
- that they are not being adopted in the US (see GAAP),
- a number of criticisms from France and
- that IAS 29 Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies had no positive effect at all during 6 years in Zimbabwe's hyperinflationary economy.
The IASB offered
responses to the first two criticisms, but has offered no response to the last
criticism while IAS 29 is currently (March 2014) being implemented in its
original ineffective form in Venezuela and Belarus.
Objective of financial statements
Financial statements are
a structured representation of the financial positions and financial
performance of an entity. The objective of financial statements is to provide information
about the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of an entity
that is useful to a wide range of users in making economic decisions. Financial
statements also show the results of the management's stewardship of the
resources entrusted to it.
To meet this objective, financial statements provide information
about an entity's:
- assets;
- liabilities;
- equity;
- income
and expenses, including gains and losses;
- contributions
by and distributions to owners in their capacity as owners; and
- cash
flows.
This information, along
with other information in the notes, assists users of financial statements in
predicting the entity's future cash flows and, in particular, their timing and
certainty.
Feature of IFRS
The following are the
general features in IFRS:
- Fair presentation and
compliance with IFRS: Fair presentation requires the faithful
representation of the effects of the transactions, other events and
conditions in accordance with the definitions and recognition criteria for
assets, liabilities, income and expenses set out in the Framework of IFRS.
- Going concern: Financial
statements are presented on a going concern basis unless management either
intends to liquidate the entity or to cease trading, or has no realistic
alternative but to do so.
- Accrual basis of accounting: An entity shall
recognise items as assets, liabilities, equity, income and expenses when they satisfy the definition and
recognition criteria for those elements in the Framework of IFRS.
- Materiality and aggregation: Every material
class of similar items has to be presented separately. Items that are of a
dissimilar nature or function shall be presented separately unless they
are immaterial.
- Offsetting: Offsetting is generally forbidden in IFRS. However
certain standards require offsetting when specific conditions are
satisfied (such as in case of the accounting for defined benefit
liabilities in IAS 19 and the
net presentation of deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets in
IAS 12 ).
- Frequency of reporting: IFRS requires that at least annually a complete
set of financial statements is presented. However
listed companies generally also publish interim financial statements (for
which the accounting is fully IFRS compliant)for which the presentation is
in accordance with IAS 34 Interim
Financing Reporting.
- Comparative information: IFRS requires entities to present comparative
information in respect of the preceding period for all amounts reported in
the current period's financial statements. In addition comparative
information shall also be provided for narrative and descriptive
information if it is relevant to understanding the current period's
financial statements. The
standard IAS 1 also requires an additional statement of financial position
(also called a third balance sheet) when an entity applies an accounting
policy retrospectively or makes a retrospective restatement of items in
its financial statements, or when it reclassifies items in its financial
statements. This for example occurred with the adoption of the revised standard
IAS 19 (as of 1 January 2013) or when the new consolidation standards IFRS
10-11-12 were adopted (as of 1 January 2013 or 2014 for companies in the
European Union).
- Consistency of presentation: IFRS requires that the presentation and
classification of items in the financial statements is retained from one
period to the next unless: (a) it is apparent, following a significant
change in the nature of the entity's operations or a review of its
financial statements, that another presentation or classification would be
more appropriate having regard to the criteria for the selection and
application of accounting policies in IAS 8; or (b) an IFRS standard
requires a change in presentation.
Qualitative characteristics of financial statements
Qualitative characteristics
of financial statements include:
· Relevance
· Faithful representation
Enhancing qualitative
characteristics include:
· Comparability
· Verifiability
· Timeliness
· Understandability
Elements of financial statements
The elements directly
related to the measurement of the statement of financial position include:
1. Asset: An asset is a resource controlled by the entity as a result of
past events and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the
entity.
2. Liability: A liability is a present obligation of the entity arising from
the past events, the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow
from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits, i.e. assets.
3. Equity: Nominal equity is the nominal residual interest in the nominal
assets of the entity after deducting all its liabilities in nominal value.
The financial
performance of an entity is presented in the statement of comprehensive
income, which consists of the income statement and the statement of other
comprehensive income (usually presented in two separate statements).
Financial performance includes the following elements (which are recognised in
the income statement or other comprehensive income as required by the
applicable IFRS standard).
1. Revenues: increases in economic benefit during an accounting period in the
form of inflows or enhancements of assets, or decrease of liabilities that
result in increases in equity. However, it does not
include the contributions made by the equity participants (for example owners, partners or shareholders).
2. Expenses: decreases in economic benefits during an accounting period in
the form of outflows, or depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities
that result in decreases in equity. However, these don't include the distributions made to the equity
participants.
Results recognised in
other comprehensive income are limited to the following specific circumstances:
- Re-measurements of defined
benefit assets or liabilities (as defined in the standard IAS 19).
- Increases or decreases in the
fair value of financial assets classified as available for sale (with the
exception of impairment losses)(as defined in the standard IAS 39).
- Increases or decreases
resulting from the application of a revaluation of property, plant and
equipment or intangible assets.
- Exchange differences resulting
from the translation of foreign operations (subsidiary, associate, joint
arrangement or branch of a reporting entity, the activities of which are
conducted in a country or currency other than those of the reporting
entity) according to the standard IAS 21.
- The portion of the gain or loss
on the hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge (or a hedge of a
net investment in a foreign operation, as this is accounted similarly)
that is determined to be an effective hedge.
The statement of
changes in equity consists of a reconciliation of the changes in
equity in which the following information is provided:
- total comprehensive income for
the period, showing separately the total amounts attributable to owners of
the parent and to non-controlling interests;
- for each component of equity,
the effects of retrospective application or retrospective restatement
recognised in accordance with IAS 8; and
- for each component of equity, a
reconciliation between the carrying amount at the beginning and the end of
the period, separately disclosing changes resulting from:
- profit or loss;
- other comprehensive income;
and
- transactions with owners in
their capacity as owners, showing separately contributions by and
distributions to owners and changes in ownership interests in
subsidiaries that do not result in a loss of control.
Statement of Cash Flows
1. Operating cash flows: the principal revenue-producing activities of the entity and are
generally calculated by applying the indirect method, whereby profit or loss is adjusted for the
effects of transaction of a non-cash nature, any deferrals or accruals of past
or future cash receipts or payments, and items of income or expense associated
with investing or financing cash flows.
2. Investing cash flows: the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other
investments not included in cash equivalents. These represent the extent to which expenditures
have been made for resources intended to generate future income and cash flows.
Only expenditures that result in a recognised asset in the statement of
financial position are eligible for classification as investing activities.
3. Financing cash flows: activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the
contributed equity and borrowings of the entity. These are important because they are useful in
predicting claims on future cash flows by providers of capital to the entity.
Notes to the Financial Statements
These shall
- (a)
present information about the basis of preparation of the financial
statements and the specific accounting policies used;
- (b)
disclose the information required by IFRSs that is not presented
elsewhere in the financial statements; and
- (c)
provide information that is not presented elsewhere in the financial
statements, but is relevant to an understanding of any of them.
Recognition of elements of financial statements
An item is recognized in
the financial statements when:
- it is probable future economic
benefit will flow to or from an entity.
- the resource can be reliably
measured
In some cases specific
standards add additional conditions before recognition is possible or prohibit
recognition altogether.
An example is the
recognition of internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles,
customer lists and items similar in substance, for which recognition is
prohibited by IAS 38. In addition research and development expenses can
only be recognised as an intangible asset if they cross the threshold of being
classified as 'development cost'.
Whilst the standard on
provisions, IAS 37, prohibits the recognition of a provision for contingent
liabilities, this prohibition is not applicable to the accounting for
contingent liabilities in a business combination. In that case the acquirer
shall recognise a contingent liability even if it is not probable that an
outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required.
Measurement of the elements of financial statements
- Par.
99. Measurement is the process of determining the monetary amounts at
which the elements of the financial statements are to be recognized and
carried in the balance sheet and income statement.
- This
involves the selection of the particular basis of measurement.
- Par.
100. A number of different measurement bases are employed to different
degrees and in varying combinations in financial statements. They include
the following:
- Historical
cost: Assets are recorded at
the amount of cash or cash equivalents paid or the fair value of the
consideration given to acquire them at the time of their acquisition.
Liabilities are recorded at the amount of proceeds received in exchange
for the obligation, or in some circumstances (for example, income taxes),
at the amounts of cash or cash equivalents expected to be paid to satisfy
the liability in the normal course of business.
- Current
cost: Assets are carried at
the amount of cash or cash equivalents that would have to be paid if the
same or an equivalent asset was acquired currently. Liabilities are
carried at the undiscounted amount of cash or cash equivalents that would
be required to settle the obligation currently.
- Realisable
(settlement) value: Assets
are carried at the amount of cash or cash equivalents that could
currently be obtained by selling the asset in an orderly disposal. Assets
are carried at the present discounted value of the future net cash
inflows that the item is expected to generate in the normal course of
business. Liabilities are carried at the present discounted value of the
future net cash outflows that are expected to be required to settle the
liabilities in the normal course of business.
- Par.
101. The measurement basis most commonly adopted by entities in preparing
their financial statements is historical cost. This is usually combined
with other measurement bases. For example, inventories are usually carried
at the lower of cost and net realisable value, marketable securities may
be carried at market value and pension liabilities are carried at their
present value. Furthermore, some entities use the current cost basis as a
response to the inability of the historical cost accounting model to deal
with the effects of changing prices of non-monetary assets.
Concepts of capital and capital maintenance
Concepts of capital
- Par.
102. A financial concept of
capital is adopted by most entities in preparing their financial
statements. Under a financial concept of capital, such as invested money
or invested purchasing power, capital is synonymous with the net assets or
equity of the entity. Under a physical concept of capital, such as
operating capability, capital is regarded as the productive capacity of
the entity based on, for example, units of output per day.
- Par.
103. The selection of the
appropriate concept of capital by an entity should be based on the needs
of the users of its financial statements. Thus, a financial concept of
capital should be adopted if the users of financial statements are
primarily concerned with the maintenance of nominal invested capital or
the purchasing power of invested capital. If, however, the main concern of
users is with the operating capability of the entity, a physical concept
of capital should be used. The concept chosen indicates the goal to be
attained in determining profit, even though there may be some measurement
difficulties in making the concept operational.
Concepts of capital maintenance and the determination of profit
- Par. 104. The
concepts of capital in paragraph 102 give rise to the following two
concepts of capital maintenance:
- Financial
capital maintenance. Under this concept a profit is earned only if the
financial (or money) amount of the net assets at the end of the period
exceeds the financial (or money) amount of net assets at the beginning of
the period, after excluding any distributions to, and contributions from,
owners during the period. Financial capital maintenance can be measured
in either nominal monetary units or units of constant
purchasing power.
- Physical
capital maintenance. Under this concept a profit is earned only if the
physical productive capacity (or operating capability) of the entity (or
the resources or funds needed to achieve that capacity) at the end of the
period exceeds the physical productive capacity at the beginning of the
period, after excluding any distributions to, and contributions from,
owners during the period.
The concepts of capital in paragraph 102 give rise to the
following three concepts of capital during low inflation and deflation:
- (1)
Physical capital.
- (2)
Nominal financial capital.
- (3)
Constant item purchasing power financial capital.
The concepts of capital
in paragraph 102 give rise to the following three concepts of capital
maintenance during low inflation and deflation:
1. Physical capital maintenance: optional during low inflation and
deflation. Current Cost Accounting model prescribed by IFRS. (See Par 106).
2. Financial capital maintenance in nominal
monetary units (Historical cost
accounting): authorized by IFRS but not prescribed—optional during low
inflation and deflation. (See Par 104 (a) Historical cost accounting).
Financial capital maintenance in nominal monetary units per se during
inflation and deflation is a fallacy: it is impossible to maintain the
real value of financial capital constant with measurement in nominal monetary
units per se during inflation and deflation.
3. Financial capital maintenance in units of
constant purchasing power (Capital
Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power): authorized by IFRS but
not prescribed—optional during low inflation and deflation. (See Par 104(a)).
Capital Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power is prescribed during
hyperinflation in IAS 29, i.e. the restatement of Historical Cost or
Current Cost period-end financial statements in terms of the period-end monthly
published Consumer Price Index. Only financial capital maintenance
in units of constant purchasing power (Capital Maintenance in Units
of Constant Purchasing Power) in terms of a daily index per se can
automatically maintain the real value of financial capital constant at all
levels of inflation and deflation in all entities that at least break even in
real value—ceteris paribus—for an indefinite period of time. This would happen
whether these entities own revaluable fixed assets or not and without the
requirement of more capital or additional retained profits to simply maintain
the existing constant real value of existing shareholders' equity constant.
Financial capital maintenance in units of constant purchasing power requires
the calculation and accounting of net monetary losses and gains from holding
monetary items during low inflation and deflation. The calculation and
accounting of net monetary losses and gains during low inflation and deflation
have thus been authorized in IFRS since 1989.
- Par.
105: The concept of capital
maintenance is concerned with how an entity defines the capital that it
seeks to maintain. It provides the linkage between the concepts of capital
and the concepts of profit because it provides the point of reference by
which profit is measured; it is a prerequisite for distinguishing between
an entity's return on capital and its return of capital; only inflows of
assets in excess of amounts needed to maintain capital may be regarded as
profit and therefore as a return on capital. Hence, profit is the residual
amount that remains after expenses (including capital maintenance
adjustments, where appropriate) have been deducted from income. If
expenses exceed income the residual amount is a loss.
- Par.
106: The physical capital
maintenance concept requires the adoption of the current cost basis of
measurement. The financial capital maintenance concept, however, does not
require the use of a particular basis of measurement. Selection of the
basis under this concept is dependent on the type of financial capital
that the entity is seeking to maintain.
- Par.
107: The principal difference between the two concepts of
capital maintenance is the treatment of the effects of changes in the
prices of assets and liabilities of the entity. In general terms, an
entity has maintained its capital if it has as much capital at the end of
the period as it had at the beginning of the period. Any amount over and
above that required to maintain the capital at the beginning of the period
is profit.
- Par.
108: Under the concept of
financial capital maintenance where capital is defined in terms of nominal
monetary units, profit represents the increase in nominal money capital
over the period. Thus, increases in the prices of assets held over the
period, conventionally referred to as holding gains, are, conceptually,
profits. They may not be recognised as such, however, until the assets are
disposed of in an exchange transaction. When the concept of financial
capital maintenance is defined in terms of constant purchasing power
units, profit represents the increase in invested purchasing power over
the period. Thus, only that part of the increase in the prices of assets
that exceeds the increase in the general level of prices is regarded as
profit. The rest of the increase is treated as a capital maintenance
adjustment and, hence, as part of equity.
- Par.
109: Under the concept of
physical capital maintenance when capital is defined in terms of the
physical productive capacity, profit represents the increase in that
capital over the period. All price changes affecting the assets and
liabilities of the entity are viewed as changes in the measurement of the
physical productive capacity of the entity; hence, they are treated as
capital maintenance adjustments that are part of equity and not as profit.
- Par.
110: The selection of the measurement bases and concept of
capital maintenance will determine the accounting model used in the
preparation of the financial statements. Different accounting models
exhibit different degrees of relevance and reliability and, as in other
areas, management must seek a balance between relevance and reliability.
This Framework is applicable to a range of accounting models and provides
guidance on preparing and presenting the financial statements constructed
under the chosen model. At the present time, it is not the intention of
the Board of IASC to prescribe a particular model other than in
exceptional circumstances, such as for those entities reporting in the
currency of a hyperinflationary economy. This intention will, however, be
reviewed in the light of world developments.
Requirements
IFRS financial statements consist of (IAS1.8)
1. a Statement of Financial Position
2. a Statement of Comprehensive
Income separate statements comprising an Income Statement and
separately a Statement of Comprehensive Income, which reconciles Profit or Loss
on the Income statement to total comprehensive income
3. a Statement of Changes in Equity (SOCE)
4. a Cash Flow Statement or Statement
of Cash Flows
5. notes, including a summary of the significant
accounting policies
Comparative information
is required for the prior reporting period (IAS 1.36). An entity preparing IFRS
accounts for the first time must apply IFRS in full for the current and
comparative period although there are transitional exemptions (IFRS1.7).
On 6 September 2007, the IASB issued a revised IAS
1 Presentation of Financial Statements. The main changes from the previous
version are to require that an entity must:
- present
all non-owner changes in equity (that is, 'comprehensive income' ) either in
one Statement of comprehensive income or in two statements (a separate
income statement and a statement of comprehensive income). Components of
comprehensive income may not be presented in the
Statement of changes in equity.
- present
a statement of financial position (balance sheet) as at the beginning of
the earliest comparative period in a complete set of financial statements
when the entity applies the new standard.
- present
a statement of cash flow.
- make
necessary disclosure by the way of a note.
*The revised IAS 1 is
effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2009. Early
adoption is permitted.
Criticisms of IFRS
1. The US Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
issued a 127-page report stating reasons why not to adopt IFRS in the
United States.The staff of the IFRS Foundation
provided a detailed answer on the main criticisms in the SEC report.
2. A number of criticisms were voiced in the
beginning of 2013 in the French media to which the IASB Board member Philippe DANJOU
responded in his document 'AN UPDATE ON INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING
STANDARDS (IFRSs).
3. It is widely acknowledged that IAS 29
Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies had no positive
effect during the six years it was implemented during hyperinflation in
Zimbabwe. This leads people to ask what the purpose of IAS 29 is when it
had no positive effect during hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. IAS 29 is currently
(March 2015) being implemented in its original ineffective form in Venezuela and
Belarus. It was suggested to the IASB in 2012 that IAS 29 should be corrected
to require daily indexation which would result in effective Capital
Maintenance in Units of Constant Purchasing Power (CMUCPP) and would
stabilize the non-monetary economy during hyperinflation. The IASB has
offered no response to date (March 2015) to this criticism and has not yet
corrected IAS 29 to require daily indexation.
Adoption in India
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) had earlier announced that IFRS will be
mandatory in India for financial statements for the periods beginning on or after 1 April 2012, but this plan
had failed. The revised roadmap recommends Ind AS to be implemented for
the preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements of listed companies and
unlisted companies having net worth in excess of Rupees 500 crore from the
accounting year beginning on or after 1st April, 2016, with previous year
comparatives in Ind AS for the year 2015-16. The stand-alone financial
statements will continue to be prepared as per the existing notified Accounting
Standards which would be upgraded over a period of time. However, there is
no clear new date of adoption of IFRS.
Reserve Bank of
India had earlier stated that financial statements of banks need to be
IFRS-compliant for periods beginning on or after 1 April 2011. However, this
has not been made applicable as yet.
The ICAI had earlier
prepared a phase wise applicability details for different companies in India:
- Phase
1: Opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2011*
1. Companies which are part of NSE Index – Nifty 50
2. Companies which are part of BSE Index – Sensex
30
1. Companies whose shares or other securities are
listed on a stock exchange outside India
2. Companies, whether listed or not, having net
worth of more than INR 1000 crore (INR 10 billion)
- Phase
2: Opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2012*
Companies not covered in
phase 1 and having net worth exceeding INR 500 crore (INR 5 billion)
- Phase
3: Opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2014*
Listed companies not
covered in the earlier phases * If the financial year of a company commences at
a date other than 1 April, then it shall prepare its opening balance sheet at
the commencement of immediately following financial year.
On 22 January 2010, the
Ministry of Corporate Affairs issued the road map for transition to IFRS. It
was clear that India had deferred transition to IFRS by a year. In the first
phase, companies included in Nifty 50 or BSE Sensex, and companies whose securities
are listed on stock exchanges outside India and all other companies having net
worth of INR 10 billion will prepare and present financial statements
using Indian Accounting Standards converged with IFRS. According to the press
note issued by the government, those companies will convert their first balance
sheet as at 1 April 2011, applying accounting standards convergent with IFRS if
the accounting year ends on 31 March. This implies that the transition date
will be 1 April 2011. According to the earlier plan, the transition date was
fixed at 1 April 2010.
Transition in phases- The present situation.
Companies, whether listed or not, having net worth of more than
INR 5 billion will convert their opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2016.
Listed companies having net worth of INR 5 billion or less will convert
their opening balance sheet as at 1 April 2016. Un-listed companies having net
worth of Rs5 billion or less will continue to apply existing accounting
standards, which might be modified from time to time. Transition to IFRS in phases is a smart move.
The transition cost for smaller companies will be much lower because large companies will bear the initial cost of learning and smaller companies will not be required to reinvent the wheel. However, this will happen only if a significant number of large companies engage Indian accounting firms to provide them support in their transition to IFRS. If, most large companies, which will comply with Indian accounting standards convergent with IFRS in the first phase, choose one of the international firms, Indian accounting firms and smaller companies will not benefit from the learning in the first phase of the transition to IFRS.
It is likely that international firms will protect their learning to retain their competitive advantage. Therefore, it is for the benefit of the country that each company makes judicious choice of the accounting firm as its partner without limiting its choice to international accounting firms. Public sector companies should take the lead and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) should develop a clear strategy to diffuse the learning.
The transition cost for smaller companies will be much lower because large companies will bear the initial cost of learning and smaller companies will not be required to reinvent the wheel. However, this will happen only if a significant number of large companies engage Indian accounting firms to provide them support in their transition to IFRS. If, most large companies, which will comply with Indian accounting standards convergent with IFRS in the first phase, choose one of the international firms, Indian accounting firms and smaller companies will not benefit from the learning in the first phase of the transition to IFRS.
It is likely that international firms will protect their learning to retain their competitive advantage. Therefore, it is for the benefit of the country that each company makes judicious choice of the accounting firm as its partner without limiting its choice to international accounting firms. Public sector companies should take the lead and the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) should develop a clear strategy to diffuse the learning.
Size of companies
The government has decided to measure the size of companies in
terms of net worth. This is not the ideal unit to measure the size of a
company. Net worth in the balance sheet is determined by accounting principles
and methods. Therefore, it does not include the value of intangible assets.
Moreover, as most assets and liabilities are measured at historical cost, the
net worth does not reflect the current value of those assets and liabilities.
Market capitalisation is a better measure of the size of a company. But it is
difficult to estimate market capitalisation or fundamental value of unlisted
companies. This might be the reason that the government has decided to use 'net
worth' to measure size of companies. Some companies, which are large in terms
of fundamental value or which intend to attract foreign capital, might prefer
to use Indian accounting standards convergent with IFRS earlier than required
under the road map presented by the government. The government should provide
that choice.
-Compiled from various
sources by Ketan Kapoor. Comments on the article are invited in the comments
section.




